SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITY AND PARTICIPATION IN URBAN ECOTOURISM SPACES IN CALABAR METROPOLIS NIGERIA 79 19

Authors

  • Adeyemi Favour Chinwe Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Calabar, Nigeria Author
  • Francis Okpiliya Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Calabar, Nigeria Author
  • Linus B. Akeh Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Calabar, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.83374/jesber.vol1no2.109

Keywords:

urban ecotourism, socioeconomic inequality, recreation participation, simulation, environmental justice, Calabar Metropolis

Abstract

This study evaluates how socioeconomic resources may structure participation in urban ecotourism and nature-based recreation in Calabar Metropolis. A reproducible quantitative simulation comprising 300 cases was analysed because no verified respondent-level field dataset accompanied the study. Participation was operationalised as a 1-5 composite of visit frequency, duration, activity diversity and regularity; income, education and occupational status were the principal predictors, with age and gender as covariates. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance and ordinary least-squares regression were applied. Mean participation increased from 2.53 in the low-status group to 2.93 in the middle-status group and 3.70 in the high-status group. The between-group effect was large, F(2, 297)=106.14, p<.001, eta-squared=.417. The multivariable model was significant, F(5, 294)=93.93, p<.001, explaining 61.5% of participation variance. Income (beta=.597) and education (beta=.434) were the dominant positive predictors; occupation was positive, age negative and gender negligible. The findings support a field-testable inequality mechanism but are not population estimates. A probability-based household survey linked to GIS accessibility and facility-quality measures is required before policy generalisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bassey, B. E. (2018). Spatial distribution of recreational resorts in a model tourism destination, Southern Nigeria. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports, 40, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.7176/JTHS/40-03

Beenackers, M. A., Kamphuis, C. B. M., Giskes, K., Brug, J., Kunst, A. E., Burdorf, A., & van Lenthe, F. J. (2012). Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: A systematic review of evidence. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-116

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.

Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513147

Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Preventive Medicine, 35(6), 601-611. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2002.1115

Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2008). Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1583-1589.

Guerrero-Moreno, M. A., et al. (2024). Community-based ecotourism: A bibliometric analysis of publications between 2002 and 2022. Sustainability, 16.

Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020). Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 6(10), e1077-e1086.

Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020). Sociodemographic inequalities in leisure-time physical activity among adults in sub-Saharan Africa: An individual participant data meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17, 72.

Igah, I. I., Agbor, C. E., Akeh, L. B., & Anake, C. B. (2026). Factors affecting the sustainability of recreational facilities in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Transdisciplinary Journal of Education & Sustainable Development Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.60787/tjesds.vol2no1.111

Kunjuraman, V. (2022). Community-based ecotourism as a social transformation tool for rural community: A victory or a quagmire? Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, 100524.

Obiefuna, J., Inah, E., Nkong, M. P., & Ekong, A. E. (2025). Spatial distribution and quality status of open green spaces and parks in Calabar Metropolitan Area, Cross River State, Nigeria. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 23(2), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5844

Odok, A. O., Omoogun, A. C., & Ephraim, P. (2013). Influence of festivals and recreational facilities on tourism development in Calabar Municipality of Cross River State. Civil and Environmental Research, 3(12), 89-95.

Sallis, J. F., Cervero, R. B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K. A., Kraft, M. K., & Kerr, J. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100

Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2015). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed., pp. 43-64). Jossey-Bass.

United Nations Tourism. (2024). International tourism highlights 2024 edition. UN Tourism.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITY AND PARTICIPATION IN URBAN ECOTOURISM SPACES IN CALABAR METROPOLIS NIGERIA. (2026). Journal of Enviromental Sciences and Built Environental Research, 1(2), 595-603. https://doi.org/10.83374/jesber.vol1no2.109

Similar Articles

1-10 of 62

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.